Moscow, Russian Federation
The article is a part of a summary of the author’s comprehensive research into tourism-specific education in Russia and abroad. The article summarizes the methodological analysis and a comparison of different personnel training models. The author substantiates the conceptual approaches to the analysis in general and to systemically independent heuristic model development in particular. Systemically independent heuristic models serve the purposes of comparative studies of pedagogical systems on the basis of a compositional integral structure with invariant content components. The author defines the concept of «decomposition» of the system of education (hierarchical dependence in the system of education), introduces the concept of «a subsystem of industry regulation» in the sphere of tourist-industry-specific education, identifies the role and significance of supersystem and system restraints and regulators, and develops a methodology for analyzing the structure and content of the models employed for tourist-industry personnel training. The methodology proposed by the author allows to consistently analyze the level of institutional maturity of a system of industry-specific education, the system internal links of a model of education, the content, the structure, the resources, the goals and objectives of personnel training systems. The methodology also provides opportunities for a comparison of national systems of personnel training, identify common development factors, pedagogical conditions for quality education. The article is of value to researchers in pedagogical systems, educators, HE learning and teaching department personnel, and non-specialist audiences interested in the issued of professional education development.
comparative pedagogical studies, non-Russian models of personnel training, structure and content of education, tourist-industry-specific personnel training
Актуальность исследования. Система российского образования переживает в настоящее время переход на дифференцированные формы получения первой ступени высшего образования: по большому числу направлений подготовки определены формы получения образования «прикладной» и «академический» бакалавриат. Названные формы бакалавриата вошли в дискурс российской системы высшего образования относительно недавно, трактуются неоднозначно в академических кругах; практически неизвестны и непонятны в среде потенциальных потребителей услуг.
1. Sakharchuk E.S. Professionalizatsiya v turizme: k voprosu o zanyatosti i formirovanii kompetentsiy. Sovremennye problemy servisa i turizma. 2011. №3. S. 91-96.
2. Sakharchuk E.S. Sovremennye mekhanizmy obespecheniya turizma kvalifitsirovannymi kadrami (opyt sotsial´nogo partnerstva v FRG i RF). Servis v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2010. №4. S. 90-99.
3. Sakharchuk E.S. Sotsial´noe proektirovanie sistemy dopolnitel´nogo professional´nogo obrazovaniya v turizme. Vestnik Assotsiatsii vuzov turizma i servisa. 2011. №2. S. 43-50.
4. Sakharchuk E.S. Sistematizatsiya determinant turistskogo obrazovaniya v Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Vestnik Assotsiatsii vuzov turizma i servisa. 2011. №3. S. 14-18.
5. Kharitonova T.V. and Chkhikvadze N.A. Research of Competence-Based Tourism Educational System’s Conformity with Requirements of a Modern Business-Society. World applied sciences journal Issue 30 (Management, Economics, Technology & Tourism), 14: p. 85-88.
6. Sakharchuk E.S. Analysis of Practice Centered Aspects of Educational Programs in the Sphere of Tourism and Hospitality. World Applied Sciences Journal 27 (Education, Law, Economics, Language and Communication): 305 308, 2013.
